May 2001
The two projects included in the QSP were supporting the work of the Working Group on Trade Liberalization and Facilitation. These projects, which include technical assistance funded by UK and Switzerland, and logistical assistance provided by the US, have been very successful. Their implementation has proceeded well and made possible the preparation of a Memorandum of Understanding between countries of the region, which will be signed in June. This MoU will initiate concrete steps with regard to intra-regional trade liberalization. This is a typical example where limited resources can have an important effect.
III.2 Regional Infrastructure Projects (34 projects)
Thanks to a good coordination of donors and creditors, all the necessary funds have been initially secured (EURO 1.237 million), except EURO 30 million for one project. 15 out of 25 construction projects have started, nine in which physical work is ongoing. Calls for tender have been launched, and are progressing according to schedule. These 15 projects represent around 75% of the total commitment for the infrastructure QSP. For the remaining 10 projects, further efforts are needed to overcome obstacles to their implementation. Of these, 7 projects (confirmed commitment of EURO 311 million) are not facing any serious difficulty but are just delayed due to different reasons (lack of legislation on land expropriation, missing agreement on project details, etc.). The three remaining projects (in BiH, Croatia and Bulgaria) need further elaboration or funding.
While a quicker implementation was generally expected by beneficiary countries, the implementation of the infrastructure projects is generally satisfactory. There is no doubt that the inclusion of these projects in the QSP has increased the speed of their implementation. However, some deadlines could not be met. The reasons being time consuming, but often inevitable, procedures and local difficulties in the implementation. Missing legislation on land expropriation as a precondition for starting infrastructure projects is a typical example for regular delays.
In the course of the implementation of infrastructure projects, it became obvious that some projects were not advancing fast enough. Therefore, high level meetings were called by the SCSP between regional and IFI representatives to address the main issues. It became obvious that the reasons for the delays were to be found both on the recipient side (bureaucratic obstacles, missing legislation etc.) and on the donors side (burdensome procedures, loose monitoring of progress, etc). The basic lesson was that even more frequent and comprehensive monitoring was required in order to minimize delays.
Concerning the studies, progress has been made in several areas. The Air Traffic Infrastructure Regional Study has been completed under the authority of the EIB. The Transport Infrastructure Study, co-sponsored by the EC and the EIB, has made satisfactory progress and a first draft will be presented in July 2001. In the meantime, the EC and the EBRD have been preparing guidance papers for the transportation, energy and water sectors. These papers will be presented at the forthcoming WT II meeting in Tirana. The Energy Sector Studies, which are under the leadership of the EC, are presently under review. The Power System Interconnection Study for BiH has been cancelled because sufficient information is now available to proceed without the study. The SEE Electrical Technical Support Project, which has been added following the WT II meeting in Istanbul (October 2000), is being implemented by Canada.
III.3 Investment Compact (1 project)
III.4 Private Sector Development (12 projects)
III.5 Vocational Education and Training (2 projects)
III.6 Environment (4 projects)
III.7 Social Dimension (5 projects)